Recently we found a new fulfillment of this biblical prophecy play out about Capitol Hill as Congress passed the actual Farm Bill 2014 laced with many different generous goodies for rich farmers and insurance companies that will probably be paid for through the taxpayers and by cuts towards the food stamps plan which advantages low income people.
THE NEW FARM BILL
It had been praised from the President as representing a new bipartisan breakthrough and signed simply by him despite his latest talk about the problem of income inequality.
In into the market there are some decorative reforms such as ending immediate payments in order to millionaires designed to become great talking factors inside election campaigns. However a closer take a look at its provisions reveals some thing extremely different.
The main provision associated with into the market is that it generates new farm subsidies and crop insurance for farmers to become paid with regard to by government if crops fail or even rates fall as well far.
In the event of just about any such occurrence your guarantee extends not just for the farmers nevertheless for the insurance providers that underwrite failure and so the federal government features to be able to spend a subsidy not only towards the farmers but to the insurance firms as well.
Senator Klobuchar (a Democrat) provides implied that this provision isn't any problem since it simply affects 16 states. but would those who lose advantages under the bill agree? Along With there is one some other issue with this particular provision.
The Congress voted to keep the public via mastering simply how much your lawmakers on his or her own maybe receiving in subsidies. There is definitely an obvious conflict of interest because these were voting in legislation which could give on their particular own any advantage and also went further by simply which includes a new provision in order to enable these phones hide it simply by excluding a duty for you to disclose it.
This with a moment when according for the Environmental Operating Group:
1) within 2013, 15 lawmakers or his or her spouses that personal farms collected the total regarding $237, 921 inside subsidy payments (Washington Post- The cause why watchdog groups don't just similar to the new farm bill, by simply Ed O'Keefe, February 7, 2014); as well as
2) subsidies are generally skewed in order to wealthier farmers simply because taxpayers support should go mostly to become able to large, profitable operations never to family farms that genuinely require assistance (The Economist, Your Farm Bill- Any trillion in the trough, February 8, 2014).
(B) CUTS IN FOOD STAMPS
The new subsidies will have to compensated regarding through taxpayers but additionally by simply cuts well over $800 million per year in the food stamp plan that was made to assist low-income folks (called Supplemental Nutrition assistance Plan or SNAP).
This cut will affect 850,000 individuals as well as will take an typical associated with $90 from his or her pocket each and every month.
It has to become able to be remembered in which 45% of meals stamp recipients are children and in 2010 USAID declared 41% are usually operating poor. Furthermore one in 7 Americans depend on food stamps (New York Times, Welfare for your Wealthy, by Mark Bittman, June 4, 2013).
The timing regarding this cut couldn't be even worse simply because in this time individuals need a safety net because the country recovers via one of the particular worst recessions when there's a expanding income inequality between your best earnings earners and the remainder of us.
The query to be inquired here's why would Congress pass such a bill?
CONGRESS: a MILLIONAIRES CLUB
The undeniable fact that Congress would pass a bill which provides much more towards the rich and fewer towards the poor can be hardly shocking due to the fact nearly all members tend to be millionaires. It is a millionaires' club.
Of your 534 present members in the house and also Senate, 268 had an average net worth of $1 million or much more within 2012, up from 257 in 2011 (NPR, majority inside Congress are usually Millionaires by simply Carly Cody, January 13, 2014).
But that is not really all. These types of members aren't reluctant to make use of their workplace web hosting benefit.
In current many years 73 lawmakers get sponsored legislation which could benefit companies that concerned these members as well as their own families. This kind of practice can be each legal along with permitted under your ethics rules.
But it truly is Congress in which writes the rules regarding itself and even though the lawmakers need executive branch officials to become able to steer distinct regarding the appearances of a conflict inside their dealings, they have certainly not inquired the same involving themselves (Washington Post, Politics- Congress members back legislation in which could benefit themselves, relatives; by Kimberley Kindy, David G. Fallis and also Scott Higham, October 7, 2012).
This is an area of what your law states that is badly short regarding funds involving reform.
IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW BILL
The new bill signifies all that's wrong together with Washington i.e. the hypocrisy along with double standards in our elected leaders.
For example, certainly 1 of the largest recipients involving farm subsidies can become a Congressman through Tennessee which says that food stamps can be theft and that will it is not the role involving Washington to be able to steal from a few inside the nation as well as share with others. so he supported your cuts for you to SNAP within the bill however will be very pleased to collect its generous subsidies, courtesy of the taxpayers and the poor.
Then there is the problem in the imbalance of political clout on Capitol Hill. The Actual Koch brothers who control Americans for Prosperity spared no sources within lobbying to have provisions which expand the particular biomass power applications and furthermore to include exemptions in the Clean water Act via which their corporate empire derives benefits.
On the other hand recipients of meals stamps had few sources using that for you to lobby and thus with out leverage they lost.
Lastly, into your current market shows which our elected leaders respond to people who fund these rather than in order to people who elect them. This has been suggested in which the reason why for the bill had been which 10 Home members which accepted the most money via agricultural lobbyists took an average associated with $225,000 inside political contributions in the actual program of 2013 and furthermore the Farm bill only agreed to end up being able to be spend again (The Economist, The Actual Farm bill etc.). This is tough for you to disagree with that.